Free Porn
xbporn

buy twitter followers
uk escorts escort
liverpool escort
buy instagram followers
Home Blog Page 14

NASA — The SLS (Space Launch System) Core Stage by…

0


Our Space Launch System (SLS) rocket is coming together at the agency’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida this summer. Our mighty SLS rocket is set to power the Artemis I mission to send our Orion spacecraft around the Moon. But, before it heads to the Moon, NASA puts it together right here on Earth.

Read on for more on how our Moon rocket for Artemis I will come together this summer:

image

How do crews assemble a rocket and spacecraft as tall as a skyscraper? The process all starts inside the iconic Vehicle Assembly Building at Kennedy with the mobile launcher. Recognized as a Florida Space Coast landmark, the Vehicle Assembly Building, or VAB, houses special cranes, lifts, and equipment to move and connect the spaceflight hardware together. Orion and all five of the major parts of the Artemis I rocket are already at Kennedy in preparation for launch. Inside the VAB, teams carefully stack and connect the elements to the mobile launcher, which serves as a platform for assembly and, later, for fueling and launching the rocket.

image

Because they carry the entire weight of the rocket and spacecraft, the twin solid rocket boosters for our SLS rocket are the first elements to be stacked on the mobile launcher inside the VAB. Crews with NASA’s Exploration Ground Systems and contractor Jacobs team completed stacking the boosters in March. Each taller than the Statue of Liberty and adorned with the iconic NASA “worm” logo, the five-segment boosters flank either side of the rocket’s core stage and upper stage. At launch, each booster produces more than 3.6 million pounds of thrust in just two minutes to quickly lift the rocket and spacecraft off the pad and to space.

image

In between the twin solid rocket boosters is the core stage. The stage has two huge liquid propellant tanks, computers that control the rocket’s flight, and four RS-25 engines. Weighing more than 188,000 pounds without fuel and standing 212 feet, the core stage is the largest element of the SLS rocket. To place the core stage in between the two boosters, teams will use a heavy-lift crane to raise and lower the stage into place on the mobile launcher.

On launch day, the core stage’s RS-25 engines produce more than 2 million pounds of thrust and ignite just before the boosters. Together, the boosters and engines produce 8.8 million pounds of thrust to send the SLS and Orion into orbit.

image

Once the boosters and core stage are secured, teams add the launch vehicle stage adapter, or LVSA, to the stack. The LVSA is a cone-shaped element that connects the rocket’s core stage and Interim Cryogenic Propulsion Stage (ICPS), or upper stage. The roughly 30-foot LVSA houses and protects the RL10 engine that powers the ICPS. Once teams bolt the LVSA into place on top of the rocket, the diameter of SLS will officially change from a wide base to a more narrow point — much like a change in the shape of a pencil from eraser to point.

image

Next in the stacking line-up is the Interim Cryogenic Propulsion Stage or ICPS. Like the LVSA, crews will lift and bolt the ICPS into place. To help power our deep space missions and goals, our SLS rocket delivers propulsion in phases. At liftoff, the core stage and solid rocket boosters will propel Artemis I off the launch pad. Once in orbit, the ICPS and its single RL10 engine will provide nearly 25,000 pounds of thrust to send our Orion spacecraft on a precise trajectory to the Moon.

image

When the Orion stage adapter crowns the top of the ICPS, you’ll know we’re nearly complete with stacking SLS rocket for Artemis I. The Orion Stage Adapter is more than just a connection point. At five feet in height, the Orion stage adapter may be small, but it holds and carries several small satellites called CubeSats. After Orion separates from the SLS rocket and heads to the Moon, these shoebox-sized payloads are released into space for their own missions to conduct science and technology research vital to deep space exploration. Compared to the rest of the rocket and spacecraft, the Orion stage adapter is the smallest SLS component that’s stacked for Artemis I.

image

Finally, our Orion spacecraft will be placed on top of our Moon rocket inside the VAB. The final piece will be easy to spot as teams recently added the bright red NASA “worm” logotype to the outside of the spacecraft. The Orion spacecraft is much more than just a capsule built to carry crew. It has a launch abort system, which will carry the crew to safety in case of an emergency, and a service module developed by the European Space Agency that will power and propel the spacecraft during its three-week mission. On the uncrewed Artemis I mission, Orion will check out the spacecraft’s critical systems, including navigation, communications systems, and the heat shield needed to support astronauts who will fly on Artemis II and beyond.

image

The path to the pad requires many steps and check lists. Before Artemis I rolls to the launch pad, teams will finalize outfitting and other important assembly work inside the VAB. Once assembled, the integrated SLS rocket and Orion will undergo several final tests and checkouts in the VAB and on the launch pad before it’s readied for launch.

The Artemis I mission is the first in a series of increasingly complex missions that will pave the way for landing the first woman and the first person of color on the Moon. The Space Launch System is the only rocket that can send NASA astronauts aboard NASA’s Orion spacecraft and supplies to the Moon in a single mission.

Make sure to follow us on Tumblr for your regular dose of space!



Source link

Robert Jeffress pledges to rebuild historic Dallas sanctuary after fire

0


The destroyed chapel at First Baptist Church of Dallas on July 20, 2024, after a large fire the night before.(Photo: First Baptist Dallas)

After the fire that all but destroyed the historic chapel at First Baptist Dallas on Friday, senior pastor Robert Jeffress promised congregants that the church will rebuild.

“It’s not the building, it’s what that building represents: It represented the bedrock foundation of God’s Word that never changes,” said the megachurch’s leader since 2007 at the Kay Bailey Hutchison Convention Center at First Baptist’s Sunday service.

Executive Pastor Ben Lovvorn said Tuesday that church staff is working to preserve the red brick walls of the Victorian chapel. The building may need to be demolished if structural engineers deem it unstable, the fire department said Saturday.

While the fire did not damage the church’s primary modern worship space, the six blocks of the campus remained blocked Sunday morning for first responders. Lovvorn said that the church campus will remain closed all week but teams are currently “making great, great progress” to reopen the worship space for services on Sunday. The cause of the blaze has not yet been determined.

The damage to the historic sanctuary is extensive with a collapsed roof. The church still awaits repair estimates and expects insurance to cover the expense. Jeffress pledged to “rebuild and re-create that sanctuary as a standing symbol of truth.”

The commitment to rebuilding is no surprise. The 134-year-old two-story chapel symbolizes the church’s relationship with the city and has become a point of pride for congregants and preservationists alike. Jeffress’ commitment echoes previous leaders who have helped the church grow into one of the largest Southern Baptist churches in the country, now boasting 16,000 members.

The church was founded in 1868. Its 11 members initially worshipped in a nearby Mason Hall. According to the state historic marker at the site, an aggressive fundraising campaign “financed by weaving rugs, making hominy, preserves, and cheese to sell at fairs” eventually led them to build a one-room frame structure.

The current chapel opened in 1890 on the same site. It was designed by Albert Ullrich, a Presbyterian architect who lived in Dallas before moving to New York. It was a notable presence in the growing downtown, along with the red brick county courthouse, which opened in 1892. Eventually the chapel expanded to seat up to 3,000 people.

Dallas, like many cities in the mid-20th century, preferred tearing down older buildings to preserving them. But longtime pastors preceding Jeffress, G.W. Truett and W.A. Criswell, who each served for 47 years, knew they could expand their downtown footprint while preserving the chapel. At the church’s 75th anniversary celebration in 1943, a year before Truett died, a pamphlet declared its allegiance to downtown:

“There is a great work for our church yet to do. Every city needs a strong downtown church to keep the community church-minded. With the future growth of Dallas clearly assured, our church must meet the great challenge and carry on a large ministry to the people, in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, our divine head.”

Criswell, one of the architects of the Conservative Resurgence within the Southern Baptist Convention, oversaw the church’s massive downtown expansion, now spanning six blocks.

“We are downtown because we choose to be downtown,” said Criswell, a two-time president of the SBC.

Under Criswell’s leadership, the church became one of the largest landowners downtown. While expanding its reach, Criswell orchestrated an ambitious and controversial plan for the denomination as leader of the Conservative Resurgence. He also led an expansion of ministries throughout the region.

A second, glass sanctuary and corporate-style campus opened in 2013. Its $135 million fundraising drive under Jeffress was the largest campaign in Protestant history.

Jeffress is, like his predecessors, an ambitious, controversial pastor and political leader. He is a spiritual adviser to former President Donald Trump and appears regularly on conservative talk shows. Throughout the years Presidents Woodrow Wilson, Gerald Ford, George H.W. Bush and Trump have visited the church. Gov. Greg Abbott spoke at the church in 2018 during a 150th anniversary celebration.

When talking about the chapel and the church’s decision to stay downtown, Jeffress told The Dallas Morning News in 2013 that staying downtown was part of its identity and ministry. This commitment is why, unlike other megachurches, it did not move to the suburbs.

“I believe the downtown area will be a source of ministry,” Jeffress said. “We want to attract the growing number of people living in both Uptown and downtown. But we will continue to draw people from the entire region.”

At Sunday’s service, Jeffress said architects told him any new modern facility “would be an architectural monstrosity.”

Mark Lamster, the News’ architecture critic, agreed. He described the Beck Group’s expansion in 2013 as “more befitting of a commercial office building than a center for divine transcendence.”

But on Sunday, Jeffress defended it. “It was a theological necessity because we were painting a picture to people throughout the community and world that, yes, methods change for sharing the gospel, media changes, but the message never changes; the message remains the same,” he said. “And having that old Victorian style building right next to a building filled with glass and all the modern technologies is a reminder, was a constant reminder, that the truth of God’s Word never, never changes.”

© Religion News Service





Source link

While the west watches a game show, the rest build a new world order – Watts Up With That?

0


From the BOE REPORT

Terry Etam

Some very big and important things are happening in the world, and it seems that we’re not paying attention at all. We are becoming so fixated on the simple, the sensational, that we’re not noticing the storm clouds.

Now, to be clear, the ballistic winging of a high-level American politician is most deserving of our attention, particularly when the circumstances and outcome are frankly not just nearly apocalyptic but bizarre. The circumstances are so strange and run counter to our expectations that have been baked in from viewing a thousand shows of that very theme (Half the audience watched the shooter wandering around, ratting him out to the cops, who did nothing? Secret Service left the roof unguarded because it’s nearly flat structure was too dangerous for SWAT teams? Huh? And on and on.).

We are no longer in the age of the Zapruder Film, where a singular grainy video captured all we know about the Kennedy assassination. Trump’s shooting was so well documented from every angle that we have acoustic engineers taking to social media with impressively detailed analyses of where shots came from, and equally impressive counter arguments based on some other esoteric analysis of another aspect. Thus, we analyze all.

Sunlight is indeed the best disinfectant, so all these viewpoints are of value and will hinder any miscreants from hiding anything. And yet I can’t help but marvel at the tectonic shifts happening in the world, almost unnoticed in the west, or ignored in the west, that are rearranging the global geopolitical landscape in significant ways, for decades to come, and it’s like we’re not even paying attention. 

The biggest, quietest movement must the the rise of BRICS, the affiliation of nine countries that have formed an alliance to ‘counter western influence’ and work to chart a new direction. The founding countries – Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa – were joined by new members at the beginning of the year, including Egypt, Ethiopia, the UAE, and Saudi Arabia (who has been coy about explicitly affirming membership but is considered member last I checked). These countries are not a chain of unpopulated tropical islands; they have a combined population of about 3.5 billion people and annual GDP of over $28 trillion. 

The BRICS group is growing quickly; earlier this year, it was reported that an additional 34 countries have expressed an interest in joining, with many applications from Africa, South America and Asia. It would not be hard to envision Russian satellite countries looking that way as well.

What makes the rise of this group so significant is that the west has charged down an economic/socioeconomic path that is reliant on at least some BRICS members/applicants (Saudi Arabia, various African countries with critical minerals, and above all China who controls the world’s metals processing capability to an alarming degree). The west is envisioning an energy transition in the next few decades that will be, to put it mildly, heavily dependent on this group’s output and capabilities.

There are two big problems arising here. One is exemplified by Europe, which is successfully reducing emissions in large part by de-industrializing and offshoring anything dirty to the developing world (then getting upset about their emissions). 

The other is the fact that the west gets apoplectic at the sight of this group frolicking in the sun without putting the west’s wishes first. For example, the west has heavily (and imo justifiably) sanctioned Russia over the attack on Ukraine, in an attempt to cripple Russia’s economy. Sanctions include a price cap on Russian oil, a tactic that was roundly mocked as having no hope of being effective by seasoned oil market analysts, but nevertheless, a sanction meant to show that the world was serious and united. 

But then a few weeks ago, India’s Prime Minister Modi paid a visit to the demon himself, Vladimir Putin, on Russian soil, and was greeted with a big hug (the hug was reciprocated; the humiliation for Putin otherwise would have been unbearable). “Why is Modi sucking up to Putin? It’s simple and cynical: China and Oil” snorted the UK’s Guardian through socialist and imperialist nostrils. The Guardian article is snide, provincial, and reeks of the arrogance of the once-relevant that won’t recognize the ‘once-‘ : “Modi knows well how to opportunistically turn someone else’s war to his advantage.” (Such pompous piffle isn’t unique; in 2023, the Economist’s editor-in-chief Manny Zinton Beddoes introduced an Economist article that explained “why the Middle East still matters to the world.” Note the complex arrogance embedded in that comment, that it is or has been a reasonable question as to whether the Middle East matters, and that you, as a dimwitted reader, will need some pedigreed ponce to explain to you the ‘why’. Go back to the 19th century.)

But anyway, step back and consider what the west is focused on, versus what the rest of the world is focused on. We follow the minutiae of sheer crap like Taylor Swift’s love life or George Clooney’s open letter about old man Biden like it is worthy of something; BRICS countries are quietly rearranging the furniture and changing the locks on the doors. We demand the world switch to ‘green initiatives’ like EVs, then slam the doors on Chinese EVs that would make them affordable to North Americans and hasten a transition. 

I’m not sweeping under the rug any of Putin’s considerable transgressions, or commenting at all on China’s strategic moves that may not align with Western ideals. They do what they do internally, and we can’t do anything about that. The point is that all of this is going on and we pretend it isn’t, because we don’t like the players or the game. 

Nowhere is this more evident than with respect to energy. Five years ago, we in the hydrocarbon sector had to listen to ignorant grandstanding blowhards explain, without a shred of energy knowledge, that hydrocarbons were so last-century, that there was no need or role for natural gas in an energy transition, that oil demand peaked in 2019 and would never recover. Every one of these dumbass claims lies trampled in the dust, and there has been not an iota of soul-searching or admission of error or recalibration; all we see is a doubling down on the same dumb thinking that went into the first cocktail of wild-eyed projections (go figure; the zealots strong-armed the International Energy Agency into an energy-transition propaganda  powerhouse, forcing them to behave as some sort of macro support dog as their leg of ‘science’. It’s no wonder they have not much to say when the results are so hopelessly far off the mark from what they were wishing for.)

Related to energy is the auto industry, where calamity now reigns supreme. Western automakers were ensured that consumers were going to switch en masse to EVs – not hybrids, but EVs – because governments were going to make them. Many countries including Canada have legislated internal combustion engines out of existence past dates in the mid 2030s. So all you SUV-spewing auto companies, get on with the transition. 29dk2902lhttps://boereport.com/29dk2902l.html

Fine, they all said, and set about building EV manufacturing facilities and battery plants. Five billion here, ten billion there, and they’re off and running, ready for governmental zero-emissions mandates. Then, a scant few years into the forced migration, a few unforeseen developments arose (not really unforeseen, more like ‘wished away’, they should have been obvious…). Consumers became lukewarm on the whole EV idea, and have decided hybrids are what they really want. Now, big players like Ford are scrambling to get more hybrids to market (wise ones like Toyota never bought into the whole idea in the first place, and now have a hybrid version of every vehicle). 

On the EV front, imagine that, China took their battery and metals processing dominance, their growing engineering prowess, and all the tricks they’ve learned from forced JVs with western companies and began a global flood of reasonably priced and well-built EVs. (China, in 2018, net imported $30 billion worth of autos. In 2023, they net exported $80 billion, and climbing rapidly. Some turnaround.) Now the west is panicking because of what those machines could do to home market manufacturers, and they’re caught between a rock and a hard place: consumers are reluctant to switch to EVs in large part because of cost, and while Chinese firms have solved the cost problem, western governments can’t allow them to decimate native industries, and are thus excluding Chinese EVs from their markets via huge tariffs. China is undeterred, and, coming back full circle to the BRICS story, is developing vast markets for their products in developing countries. 

The 3.5 billion BRICS people, plus a few billion more around the edges, are finding their feet, their strength, and their voice, and saying either overtly or via trade deals that “We think we can get along on our own, thanks anyway.”

This reworking of the global order should be front page news, as it is going to be rather cataclysmic for the golden billion. Haha. Get real. Good luck for that story to fight its way in front of the dancing bears. Another example: As mentioned, about ten days ago, Donald Trump came within an inch or two of being murdered live on national media. Kind of a big deal. And yet that story has been pushed from the front pages by what should be the most obvious and anticlimactic story imaginable, that an 81-year old with severely diminishing mental capacity stepped down from the most powerful seat in the world. Gee, who saw that coming. 

And next week will be an damning/hilarious/embarrassing/brilliant (ok scratch brilliant)/ridiculous video clip of Kamala or Donald or some grandstanding political boob, and we’ll watch it 50 million times and argue about it like our lives depend on it, and in the background China will quietly sign billions of dollars of development deals with developing countries; Russia, Iran, India and many others will continue strengthening cooperative channels that the west pretends doesn’t exist (we do see it: “Growing Cooperation Between Russia and China in Arctic, Pentagon Says” reports Reuters, and that the US, Canada, and Norway hope to sign a deal by year end to begin the process of building new icebreakers at some time in the next decade or two, at the regulatory speed these things work), and the frog will find at some point that the water is too hot to leap out of. And the North Korean flat top is going to be next year’s Gangnam Style must see. That we’d watch.

What the world desperately needs – energy clarity. And a few laughs. Pick up The End of Fossil Fuel Insanity,  available at Amazon.caIndigo.ca, or Amazon.com.

Read more insightful analysis from Terry Etam here, or email Terry here.

4.6
10
votes

Article Rating



Source link

BRICS Games: Strengthening Inter-Cultural Friendship and Solidarity | – Business Post Nigeria

0



BRICS Games: Strengthening Inter-Cultural Friendship and Solidarity |  Business Post Nigeria



Source link

Béis vs Monos: Which Should You Buy in 2024?

0


Over the past 10 years, the luggage market has boomed with startup brands selling trendy, polycarbonate suitcases with luxury features but at prices lower than luxury brands. Béis and Monos are two of these, and choosing between them isn’t easy.

I’ve spent months testing and analyzing dozens of suitcases, including several models from these two brands. I compared suitcases from both brands using our in-depth luggage rating system, which evaluates luggage across 33 individual objective and subjective metrics. Those findings showed me exactly where each brand excels.

Béis was founded by the actress and influencer Shay Mitchell. As you’d expect, Béis suitcases are very stylish and on-trend, but they also include a surprising array of innovative features.

Monos focuses on creating functional, minimalist luggage designed to offer luxury-level quality at an accessible price. Their design philosophy is to create simple designs and make products that last.

On the surface, these two brands are very similar: they both sell high-quality polycarbonate luggage. But when you dig under the surface, there are definitely some important differences.

I’ll walk you through those differences and help you decide which brand has the right suitcase for you.

Why You Can Trust Us

The TravelFreak editorial team has tested dozens of suitcases over the years, and we’ve learned a lot about what separates a quality piece of luggage from an overpriced, overhyped piece of plastic. We’ve tested and reviewed budget luggage, luxury suitcases, and everything in between.

We know how hard it is to find the perfect suitcase, and we want to make the process easier for you. So our team of gear junkies and product engineers developed the most comprehensive luggage test methodology possible.

We tested and rated 4 Béis suitcases and 11 Monos suitcases, including carry-ons and checked bags from both brands.

We evaluated every one of these suitcases on 31 metrics across eight categories. We gave them all the same treatment and rated them on the same standardized scales. This makes it easy for us (and you) to compare the advantages and disadvantages of each.

At a Glance

Scores

Average Overall Score

8.8

9.4

Average Build Quality Score 8.7 9.2
Average Ease of Use Score 7.1 8.7
Average Functionality Score 9.0 8.5
Average Water Resistance Score 9.1 9.1
Average Brand Impact Score 4.5 8.5
Average Buying Experience Score 7.1 7.4
Average Warranty Score 7.0 10.0
Average Price-to-Performance Score 7.8 6.7

Specs

Type Hardside, Softside Hardside
Warranty Limited lifetime Lifetime
Returns Pay for return shipping, 60-day Pay for return shipping, 100-day
Manufacturing Location(s) China China

Béis vs Monos: Quick Answers

  • Durability: Monos luggage is generally more durable and well-built overall.
  • Price: Béis is less expensive than Monos.
  • Warranty: Most Samsonite luggage has a 10-year warranty, while Monos has a limited lifetime warranty on every suitcase.
  • Sustainability: Monos is much better for sustainability and brand impact. They are Certified Climate Neutral and are a member of 1% for the Planet.
  • Materials: Both Monos and Béis use high-quality polycarbonate on all their products.
  • Design and Style: Both brands have minimalist, modern styling. Monos is a bit more subdued and professional. Béis is a bit more fun.
  • Interior Organization: Béis and Monos have very similar interior designs, but Béis suitcases have an extra toiletry pocket.
  • Expandability: Every Béis suitcase is expandable, while you have to pay extra to get an expandable Monos suitcase.
  • Wheels: Both brands have high-quality double spinner wheels, but Monos’ wheels are a bit smoother and more durable.
  • Handle: Monos luggage handles are stronger and have less flex than Béis handles.
  • Color Options: Both Monos and Béis have a wide range of color options.

Béis vs Monos: Which Should You Buy?

Buy Béis if you…

  • often travel internationally (get the Small Carry-On Roller).
  • need luggage for vacations and getaways.
  • are a light packer who doesn’t always need maximum carry-on size, OR
  • sometimes need extra packing space.

Buy Monos if you…

  • are a frequent traveler.
  • mainly take domestic flights within the US.
  • travel for business or are a digital nomad.
  • take longer trips.
  • care more about durability than features.
  • are concerned about sustainability and buying eco-friendly products.

Materials & Quality

Monos Materials

Both Béis and Monos use polycarbonate hard shells for all of their luggage. Polycarbonate is pretty much the gold-standard material for hardside suitcases right now. It’s tough, lightweight, and scratch-resistant.

The most impressive thing about Béis is that they’re able to offer full polycarbonate suitcases at a lower price than most of their competitors, including Monos.

Beyond the shell, the details of Béis suitcases also feel well made. The handles aren’t overly rattly, the interior lining is slick and water-resistant, the spinner wheels are smooth-rolling and sturdy.

However, Monos is a bit higher quality in every respect. It’s not a huge difference, but Monos’ wheels, handles, and components are all just a bit better than Béis’. For example, Béis uses glue to attach their grab handles, while Monos uses sturdy screws, and the Monos telescoping handle is stronger and has less flex to it.

In our testing, Monos scored 9.2 for Build Quality, while Béis scored 8.7.

Don’t get me wrong, Béis luggage is plenty durable; it’s just not quite as tough as Monos.

The one downside is that I’ve seen Monos suitcases come out of the baggage claim with some serious scratches and scuffs. This is only cosmetic, but it still is a bummer. Fortunately, our guide for how to clean luggage has tips for how to remove these scuffs.

Both of these brands design their luggage to be durable and to last for a long time, so I don’t think you’ll be disappointed with either one. If durability is your top priority, though, Monos is a better choice.

That said, Béis is pretty close and comes in at a lower price.

Design & Features

 

Monos Design & Features

On the surface, Béis and Monos luggage looks pretty similar. Both have streamlined polycarbonate shells with a series of horizontal lines to add some interest. I’d say that Monos luggage looks more understated and professional (especially in black, navy, or gray), while Béis is a little more playful. But really, either one is versatile enough to fit in in any situation (well, maybe the bright yellow Béis Carry-On Roller would look out of place in a conference room).

The similarities continue once you open these suitcases up. They have very similar layouts, with a zippered divider and some pockets on one side and a big compression panel with elastic straps on the other.

Yes, Béis and Monos suitcases are very similar, but there are a few important differences that may make you lean one way or the other, depending on

First off, every single Béis suitcase is expandable, with a wrap-around zipper that adds extra depth. Monos has added expandable bags to their lineup, but they cost significantly more than standard. For example, compare the Béis Carry-On Roller with the equivalent Monos Expandable Carry-On.

If you like the versatility of an expandable suitcase, Béis gives you a much better bang for your buck.

Both brands have a carry-on model with a front pocket for a laptop, but the Monos Carry-On Pro has a pocket that’s much more protective than the Béis Front Pocket Carry-On Roller. Monos would be my choice for traveling with a laptop.

Monos suitcases are also a little simpler and more minimal, while Béis suitcases have a few extra features. Béis bags have a few more pockets inside, including a waterproof toiletry pocket. They also have a weight indicator on the handle that will show red if your bag is over 50 lbs. There’s even a little retractable bag strap on top that you can loop through the handle of a purse or handbag to attach it to your suitcase.

These features are the main reason Béis scored 9.0 for functionality, while Monos only scored 8.5. They aren’t game-changers, but they’re nice to have.

Lastly, and this one’s important, Béis has a few size options that Monos doesn’t offer. Their Small Carry-On Roller is compact enough to fit within the strictest carry-on size limits anywhere in the world. If you’re traveling internationally, this is probably the best carry-on from either brand.

Béis also has a Mini Roller, which is small enough to fit under the airplane seat and count as a personal item, and it’s adorable. It’s great for kids, but it also works well if you are a light-packer going on a quick weekend trip, especially if you’re flying with a budget airline that charges for carry-ons.

Value for Your Money

Beis Value for Money

If you’re trying to get the most bang for your buck, Béis has lower prices and more features. Béis scored 7.8 for our Price-to-Performance metric, and Monos only scored 6.7.

Especially if you want any extra features like expandability or an extra pocket, Béis will save you some cash.

That said, if you don’t care about expandability, the price difference isn’t huge, and Monos suitcases are definitely sturdier and more durable than Béis. If you’re a frequent traveler, I think investing a bit more in a Monos suitcase will pay off in the long run.

Warranty and Buying Experience

Béis has a good limited lifetime warranty that covers manufacturing defects and any major damage to the wheels, handles, or shell, but their warranty policy clearly states that they don’t cover damage caused by “accidents, abrasion… or airline handling.”

I’m not sure how you’d break your suitcase without an accident or abrasion. Basically, they’ll replace your suitcase if they decide they want to.

Monos’ warranty is much more confidence-inspiring. They guarantee that they’ll repair or replace your luggage if the shell, zippers, wheels, or handles are damaged, and the exceptions are damage caused by “intentional abuse, modification, tampering, and/or alteration.”

That makes way more sense.

Monos luggage does cost a bit more, but you’re paying for durability and their better lifetime warranty. They also have a 100-day trial period, which gives you time to decide if you really like your purchase enough to keep it.

Brand Impact & Sustainability

This one’s simple. If buying sustainable products matters to you, you should choose Monos over Béis. Monos scored 8.5 for brand impact, and Béis scored a pretty disappointing 4.5.

Béis doesn’t use recycled materials, and as far as I’ve been able to find, they have no programs or initiatives towards sustainability or improving the impact of their products and business.

Monos, on the other hand, uses recycled fabric in every suitcase, is Climate Neutral Certified, and is a member of 1% for the Planet, which means they donate at least 1% of revenue to environmental non-profits like Ecotrust Canada, Earth Guardians, and Heal the Ocean. So far they’ve donated $1,738,755.

Also, by building products that are designed to last a long time and providing a reliable lifetime warranty, Monos is working to keep their suitcases from ending up in landfills. That’s good for you and for the planet.

Final Thoughts

Hopefully by now you’ve got a pretty good idea of the differences between Béis and Monos, and which one might be a better fit for your travels.

Want a trendy, practical suitcase for getaway trips? Béis luggage is stylish, less expensive, and loaded with features to make traveling easier.

Are you a frequent traveler looking to invest in a top-notch piece of luggage that will last for years of travel. Monos only costs a little more than Béis, and their suitcases are more durable and refined (and come with a better warranty).

I’ve been happy with suitcases from both brands, and they both performed well in our testing. I don’t think you can go wrong either way, the choice just comes down to what you prioritize.

Béis Luggage Review and Monos Luggage Review FAQs

Is Béis or Monos luggage better?

Monos luggage is higher quality overall, but Béis is a great alternative that’s a bit cheaper and has more features.

What are alternatives to Monos luggage?

Béis, July, and Away are all popular alternatives to Monos luggage.

Is Monos a Japanese brand?

No, Monos is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.

What material is Béis luggage made of?

Béis suitcases have hardshells made from 100% polycarbonate.

Does the Monos Carry-On fit in the overhead bin?

The Monos Carry-On will fit in the overhead bin on most major airlines, but it may be too big for some budget international flights.

Jeremy Scott Foster

About the Author

Jeremy Scott Foster

Jeremy Scott Foster is an adventure-junkie, gear expert and travel photographer based in Southern California. Previously nomadic, he’s been to ~50 countries and loves spending time outdoors. You can usually find him on the trail, on the road, jumping from bridges or hustling on his laptop working to produce the best travel and outdoors content today.



Source link

Sustainable practices though copilots and AI

0


Everton Molina, Senior Product & Software Engineering Manager at Luizalabs

2024 is shaping up to be a transformative year, and the world of web development is no exception. A significant trend is the rise of generative AI, which dominates the tech news space. Like any emerging technology, it brings numerous opportunities, and business leaders are prioritizing it for the coming years.

While the application of AI as a great enabler to solve customer needs and increase productivity is well-known, its role in tackling the ‘environmental sustainability’ challenge is less discussed.

With the emergence of generative AI, copilots have become increasingly useful in a software engineer’s daily work. These coding assistants work closely with software engineers to streamline and improve their workflow, freeing them from the complexities of non-functional code and allowing them to focus on the core functionality and business logic of applications. A good application of this can be in good development practices and enhance code quality, security, and guidance for more reliable applications. Furthermore, these tools combined with Low-Code/No-Code (LCNC) capabilities make a match made in technology heaven, unlocking a new level of accessibility and efficiency in addition to empowering a wide range of engineers, including the most junior ones, to create much more robust solutions.

“Machine learning and generative AI personalize web content based on user behavior, reducing unnecessary page views and data transfers and delivering more relevant content.”

In light of this, how can technologies be a powerful tool for minimizing the carbon footprint produced during web development processes? Let’s explore two key areas: code optimization and personalization.

Code Optimization

Software engineers can optimize code and resource usage by generating more efficient code, focusing on core functionality and business rules, minimizing redundancies, eliminating unnecessary code blocks, enhancing image and video formats, and simplifying data transfer. These practices help engineers choose better options that lead to smaller code and file sizes, reducing server load and power consumption.

Personalization

Machine learning and generative AI personalize web content based on user behavior, reducing unnecessary page views and data transfers and delivering more relevant content.

Additionally, AI can predict what content a loyal and recurring user of the application is likely to access, allowing the pre-cache of the content, eliminating the need for additional server requests, and lowering server load and power consumption.

Optimizing server load is vital in combating climate change. Data centers, with their immense processing power, are among the largest energy consumers globally, consuming hundreds of TWh (terawatt-hours) with a rising trend. As major tech companies increase AI model training, which demands significant resources and consistent energy, employing these strategies ensures that energy savings from optimizations surpass the their usage in training models. Knowing this, engineers can and should take advantage of it to create greener applications, contributing to a sustainable digital future.



Giuliano Amato, l'imbarazzante fuorionda con Giovanna Pancheri: «Mademoiselle, quando stacchi?». La reazione della giornalista – leggo.it

0



Giuliano Amato, l’imbarazzante fuorionda con Giovanna Pancheri: «Mademoiselle, quando stacchi?». La reazione della giornalista  leggo.it



Source link

How to Write an Ebook in 24 hours (make $1000 a week selling ebooks)

Today I’m going show you how to write an ebook in 24 hours or less! You read that right. My first ebook made me almost $1500 in a weekend and I wrote it in a day. Writing ebooks are a great start to creating digital products for your brand and can be very lucrative. So today I’m gonna show you how to do it the easy way.

**FREE GUIDE: 40+ Profitable eBook Ideas –

Get my EBOOK WORKSHOP HERE:

// MENTIONED IN THIS VIDEO
Canva –
Sendowl –

// VIDEOS TO WATCH NEXT:
7 Ebooks. you can Write and Launch Fast –
Before you Write your Ebook:
How to Create and Sell an Ebook in Canva –
How to Create an Ebook in Canva Step by Step –
Make $100 a day with a Digital Product Business –
8 Digital Products that ACTUALLY SELL –
How to Create and Sell Digital Products FAST –
Passive Income Ideas to Make Money in your sleep –

//TIMESTAMPS
0:00 how to write an ebook in a day intro

// SHOP MY PRODUCTS
Blogging Simplified course:
Youtube Simplified masterclass:
How to Start a Blog ebook –

Shop My Amazon store –

#writeanebook #ebook

// MY BLOGGING TOOLS
Web Hosting & Domains (BlueHost) –
Courses & Ebooks –
Blog Themes (17th Ave) –
Create Graphics (Canva) –
Email Newsletter (Convertkit) –
Pinterest Scheduling (Tailwind) –
Help with my Blog (Fiverr) –

// MY FAVORITE YOUTUBE TOOLS
Youtube optimization (TubeBuddy) –
Where I get Music (Epidemic Sound) –
Where I create Graphics (Canva) –

// MY CONTENT CREATION EQUIPMENT
Main camera –
Main lens –
Vlog camera –
Camera remote –
Beginner camera –
External Hard drive –
SD card –
Big Tripod –
Small Tripod –
Box Lights –
Ring Light –

MY BOOK RECOMMENDATIONS
Get 2 free books with Audible! –
Influencer –
The 12 Week Year –
Atomic Habits –
The Big Leap –
Building a Story Brand –
Traction –
Superfans –

// JOIN THE WYNNING TEAM

New videos every week
Current Subscriber count:

// CONNECT WITH ME ONLINE
My Weekly Newsletter –
My Blog –
Instagram –
Pinterest –

Business inquiries: hello@nakishawynn.com

*Disclaimer: This video description contains Amazon affiliate links and other affiliate links. That means that if you click a link and decide to make a purchase I will receive a commission at no extra cost to you. Youtube and blogging is a stream of income for me, and your purchases help support this channel and my family. Thank you so much for your continued support.

This video is about:
how to write an ebook in 24 hours
how to write an ebook in a day
how to create and sell an ebook
ebook writing
how to create an ebook
how to write an ebook and make money
how to create an ebook to sell

// NAKISHA

I’m Nakisha and I’m a full time entrepreneur. I teach moms how to make money from home with freelancing and and digital content marketing. I’ve helped many moms create additional income for their families and finally pursue the life they really want. On this channel I share my journey of building my business from scratch, while sharing how I’m marketing, monetizing, and balancing life as a mom & entrepreneur……I hope it helps you grow too!

source

(NEW PODCAST) Are US Relations With Israel About To Get A Lot Worse?

0


(OPINION) In tonight’s podcast, We discuss how the recent transition of power in the White House may translate to a more significant fracture in relations between Israel and the current Presidential administration. We also discuss a recent example of how politics is causing further division and persecution within the Church.

  • End Time Headlines is a Ministry that provides News and Headlines from a “Prophetic Perspective” as well as weekly podcasts to inform and equip believers of the Signs and Seasons that we are living in today.

    View all posts




Source link

Skeptical Science New Research for Week #29 2024

0


Skeptical Science New Research for Week #29 2024

Posted on 18 July 2024 by Doug Bostrom, Marc Kodack

Open access notables

Improving global temperature datasets to better account for non-uniform warming, Calvert, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society:

To better account for spatial non-uniform trends in warming, a new GITD [global instrumental temperature dataset] was created that used maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) to combine the land surface air temperature (LSAT) anomalies of non-infilled HadCRUT5 with the sea surface temperature (SST) anomalies of HadSST4. This GITD better accounts for non-uniform trends in warming in two ways. Firstly, the underlying warming trends in the model are allowed to vary spatially and by the time of year. Secondly, climatological differences between open-sea and sea ice regions are used to better account for changes in sea ice concentrations (SICs). These improvements increase the estimate of GMST change from the late 19th century (1850–1900) to 2023 by 0.006°C and 0.079°C, respectively. Although, for the latter improvement, tests suggest that there may be an overcorrection by a factor of two and estimates of SICs for the late 19th century are a significant source of unquantified uncertainty. In addition, this new GITD has other improvements compared to the HadCRUT5 Analysis dataset, including correcting for a small underestimation of LSAT warming between 1961 and 1990, taking advantage of temporal correlations of observations, taking advantage of correlations between land and open-sea observations, and better treatment of the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO). Overall, the median estimate of GMST change from the late 19th century to 2023 is 1.548°C, with a 95% confidence interval of [1.449°C, 1.635°C].

Roofing Highways With Solar Panels Substantially Reduces Carbon Emissions and Traffic Losses, Jiang et al., Earth’s Future

Roofing highways with solar panels offers a new opportunity for PV development, but its potential of global deployment and associated socio-economic impacts have not been investigated. Here, we combine solar PV output modeling with the global highway distribution and levelized cost of electricity to estimate the potential and economic feasibility of deploying highway PV systems worldwide. We also quantify its co-benefits of reducing CO2 equivalent emissions and traffic losses (road traffic deaths and socio-economic burdens). Our analysis reveals a potential for generating 17.58 PWh yr−1 of electricity, of which nearly 56% can be realized at a cost below US$100 MWh−1. Achieving the full highway PV potential could offset 28.78% (28.21%–29.1%) of the global total carbon emissions in 2018, prevent approximately 0.15 million road traffic deaths, and reduce US$0.43 ± 0.16 trillion socio-economic burdens per year. Highway PV projects could bring a net return of about US$14.42 ± 4.04 trillion over a 25-year lifetime. 

Asymmetric and Irreversible Response of Tropical Cyclone Potential Intensity to CO2 Removal, Huan & Yan, Geophysical Research Letters:

Understanding the behaviors of tropical cyclone (TC) intensity under the CO2 removal scenario is important for future climate adaptation and policy making. Based on the idealized CO2 ramp-up (from 284.7 to 1,138.8 ppm) and symmetric ramp-down experiments, our results suggest an asymmetric and irreversible response of TC potential intensity to CO2 reduction. Potential intensity shows an additional enhancement at the same CO2 level during the CO2 ramp-down relative to the ramp-up periods (though with regional differences), and does not completely return to the initial value even when CO2 recovers on multi-decadal to centennial timescale. The enhanced potential intensity is dominated by the increased thermodynamic disequilibrium, which is mainly attributed to the weakened surface winds arising from the El Niño-like warming pattern and inter-hemispheric ocean temperature contrast.

Cyber-echoes of climate crisis: Unraveling anthropogenic climate change narratives on social media, Elroy et al., Current Research in Environmental Sustainability [perspective]:

In this work, we collected 333,635 tweets in English about anthropogenic climate change. We used Natural Language Processing (NLP) and machine learning methods to embed the semantic meaning of the tweets into vectors, cluster the tweets, and analyze the results. We clustered the tweets into four clusters that correspond to four narratives in the discussion. Analyzing the behavioral dynamics of each cluster revealed that the clusters focus on the discussion of whether climate change is caused by humans or not, scientific arguments, policy, and conspiracy. The research results can serve as input for media policy and awareness-raising measures on climate change mitigation and adaptation policies, and facilitating future communications related to climate change.

Voters do not punish their government for climate policies under favorable conditions, Henriks et al., Environmental Politics:

This article investigates the impact of climate policies on electoral support for governing parties in Sweden through mixed methods combining a sentiment analysis of news articles and regression discontinuities of voter support over time. The regression discontinuity models indicate that the effects of climate policies on government support are not robust and are spurious across different model specifications. To ensure that we can detect effects, we used a set of political events that could have affected government support, such as elections and the Covid-pandemic as robustness checks. Contrary to expectations from literature and analyzed news reporting, we cannot determine robust effects of introducing climate policies on governmental support in Sweden. This suggests that governments do not need to anticipate losing substantial support when implementing climate policies – at least in favorable conditions.

Confronting heat-related illnesses and deaths at mass gathering religious and sporting events, McCloskey et al., The Lancet Planetary Health:

As global temperatures continue to rise, climate change should become increasingly important in the planning of mass gatherings and should be viewed as an existential threat to all mass sporting, artistic, and religious events. As such, planners and organisers of these events need to start to bring together research, ideas, and technology that can reduce future risks of severe heat-related illnesses and deaths.

Actions speak louder than words: the case for responsible scientific activism in an era of planetary emergency, Wyatt et al., Royal Society Open Science:

To date, governments’ decisions (such as continuing with vast subsidies for fossil fuels) clearly show that powerful vested interests have been much more influential than the amassed scientific knowledge and advice. We argue that in the face of this inaction, scientists can have the maximum amount of influence by lending their support to social movements pressing for action, joining as active participants and considering civil disobedience. Scientists seeking to halt continued environmental destruction also need to work through our institutions. Too many scientific organizations, from national academies of science to learned societies and universities, have not taken practical action on climate; for example, many still partner with fossil fuel and other compromised interests. We therefore also outline a vision for how scientists can reform our scientific institutions to become powerful agents for change.

From this week’s government and NGO section:

How the Oil Industry Has Sustained Market Dominance Through Policy Influence, InfluenceMap

The authors discuss the entrenched nature of the oil and gas industry’s opposition to the alternatives to fossil fuels, revealing a decades-long playbook employed to hinder progress toward the transition. It builds on previous analysis of historical fossil fuel industry lobbying that highlighted the use of climate science denial tactics. It demonstrates that a range of other narratives and arguments are still being deployed by the sector to this day, despite contradicting the Science-Aligned Climate Policy analysis of the IPCC. The authors highlight the potentially seismic effects that are associated with this influencing campaign, which has enabled an expanded and sustained market for fossil fuel products at the expense of zero-carbon alternatives. The sale and use of these products have resulted in cumulative GHG emissions that now threaten to put global temperature rises on track for catastrophic climate impacts.

Clean Energy Isn’t Driving Power Price Spikes, Brendan Pierpont, Energy Innovation Policy & Technology

Some observers have argued that clean energy is to blame for rising electric rates, but the data does not support this conjecture. The author walks through recent trends in electricity rates and unpacks the myriad factors that have contributed to rate increases in recent years, leading to several key takeaways including evidence that does not suggest that clean energy is driving electricity cost increases; wildfire costs and risks have significantly increased electricity rates in California; natural gas price volatility has been a major driver of higher electricity costs in some states; utilities have made substantial investments in aging, uneconomic coal plants, raising costs to customers; transmission and distribution costs are rising nearly twice as fast as inflation, driven by a focus on grid hardening, resilience, and advanced technology; and regulated utility profit margins and bias toward capital investments underly rising electricity rates.

136 articles in 67 journals by 757 contributing authors

Physical science of climate change, effects

The correlation between Arctic sea ice, cloud phase and radiation using A-Train satellites, Cesana et al., Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Open Access 10.5194/acp-24-7899-2024

Observations of climate change, effects

Amplified warming of North American cold extremes linked to human-induced changes in temperature variability, Blackport & Fyfe, Nature Communications Open Access 10.1038/s41467-024-49734-8