Learning With The Dumbest Genius Librarian – Watts Up With That?

Since then, I came across a fascinating way to use any AI for research into any topic. Want to learn about something fast? Here’s how. Want to drill down into some recondite corner of a topic? This will do it. Whether you’re looking for the broadest overview or the most detailed, try this method.

What it is is a structured prompt. You paste in the prompt, put in the subject of interest in as few or many words as you wish, and it does all the rest.

Here’s the prompt in question. Yes it’s long, yes, you have to copy and paste it in, but just once, at the start of each new topic.

Structured Topic Investigation Prompt

1. Prompt Input

• Topic Selection:
  Enter your topic of interest between the curly braces below:
  Topic = {}
  The topic you provide will be referenced as “M” throughout the prompt.

2. Core Principles

• Role Clarification:
  • I am a researcher gathering information for article creation. You are my assistant.
  • The assistant must not assist in designing, structuring, or suggesting articles about “M.”
  • The assistant’s sole purpose is to provide comprehensive, factual information about “M” for my independent use.
• Strict Boundaries:

• Do not suggest article ideas or structures for “M.”
• Do not offer tips or advice on writing about “M.”
• Only provide information, facts, and references about “M.”
• All information should be detailed and exhaustive, maximizing the use of available space.

3. Output System

Output Selection Process

• After you submit your topic, the assistant will prompt:
  “Which output do you need? (Type the number: 1, 2, etc.)”
• You select the output by entering its number.
• The assistant provides only the selected output.
• If you type “more”, the assistant expands on the current output type with additional detail.

Output 1: Basic Information

• Purpose: To provide an accessible overview of “M.”
• Contents:
  • Introduction to “M”
  • General information about “M”
  • Key highlights and points about “M”
• Navigation:
  • At the end of output 1, type the following lines:
  • “Which output do you need?
  • “Type “1” for Basic Information about the study of emergent thermoregulatory climate phenomena.”
  • “Type “2” for Specialized Information (with a table of contents of advanced topics).”
  • “You may also type “more” after any output to expand it further.”

Output 2: Specialized Information

• Purpose: To deliver in-depth, academic, or technical information about “M.”
• Contents:
  • Table of contents listing specialized topics related to “M.”
  • Each topic is available for detailed exploration.
  • All factual claims are supported by citations from authoritative, primary sources only (e.g., government websites, peer-reviewed journals).
  • Citations are to be appended as live hyperlinks at the end each statement at Level 2 or any sublevel
  • The links are to be of the form “[1]”, “[2]”, with each link surrounded by square brackets.
  • Always prioritize and cross-check the most recent, authoritative primary sources (such as official government websites and current news reports) over any internal or cached data.
  • Do not attempt to fill missing information with plausible-sounding but unverified statements. If the answer cannot be fully supported by direct, primary evidence, state this explicitly and do not extrapolate.
  • No unverified summaries is included.
  • If direct evidence is lacking, the assistant must explicitly state the limitation and refrain from speculation or extrapolation.
• Output Instructions:

• The assistant displays a numbered table of contents of specialized topics.
• You select a topic by typing its name or number, except you must use “option 1” for choice 1.
• The assistant provides comprehensive, source-cited information on the chosen topic.
• Below it, type:
  • – “Which topic are you interested in?”
    • If the name of the desired topic is typed, provide complete specialized information about that topic.
  • Type “If you need more topics about ‘M’, please type ‘more’”
    • If “more” is typed, provide additional topics beyond the initial list. If “more” is typed again after the second round, add even more initial topics beyond the previous two sets.
    • A note for you: When compiling the topics initially, try to include as many relevant topics as possible to minimize the need for using this option.
  • Type “If you need access to subtopics of any topic, please type ‘topics … (desired topic)’.”
    • If the specified text is typed, provide the subtopics (secondary topics) of the initial topics.
    • Even if I type “topics … (a secondary topic)”, still provide the subtopics of those secondary topics, which can be called “third-level topics”, and this can continue to any level. – At any stage of the topics (initial, secondary, third-level, etc.), typing “more” will always expand the topics at that same level.
  • Type “Copy any subtopic and paste it in below to explore that topic”
  • Type “more” to expand the list of topics at the current level.
  • Type “To see subtopics, type:
    “topics … (desired topic)”
• This hierarchical exploration can continue to any depth (secondary, tertiary topics, etc.).
• At any time, type “1” to return to Basic Information, or “option 1” to select the first topic in a list.
• Citation Policy:
  • Every claim is directly linked to a primary source by a live hyperlink at the end of the line containing the claim, in the format: “[1]”, “[2]” etc.
  • No AI-generated, secondary, or reputation-based sources are accepted.
  • If a statement cannot be traced to a primary source, it is omitted.

4. Summary of Workflow

• Enter your topic.
• Select the output type (1 for Basic, 2 for Specialized).
• Navigate through topics and subtopics using provided commands.
• Use “more” to request additional detail at any level.
• Return to Basic Information by typing “1” at any point.

Thank you for your cooperation. Please enter your topic and select the desired output to begin.

OK, so that’s the prompt. Copy it, go to your favorite AI and paste it in. I use perplexity.ai. Me being me, I put the following topic in between the braces in the “Prompt Input” section at the top:

The study of emergent thermoregulatory climate phenomena

Here’s what I got back:

Which output do you need?

Type “1” for Basic Information about the study of emergent thermoregulatory climate phenomena.

Type “2” for Specialized Information (with a table of contents of advanced topics).

You may also type “more” after any output to expand it further.

So I type “1”, and here’s what I get:

Basic Information: The Study of Emergent Thermoregulatory Climate Phenomena

Introduction

The study of emergent thermoregulatory climate phenomena focuses on understanding how complex systems—such as the Earth’s atmosphere, biosphere, and hydrosphere—develop self-organizing behaviors that regulate temperature and climate. “Emergent” refers to properties or patterns that arise from interactions among simpler components, leading to outcomes that cannot be easily predicted by examining individual parts alone. “Thermoregulatory” describes processes that stabilize or modulate temperature, often in response to external or internal changes.

General Information

• Definition: Emergent thermoregulatory climate phenomena are patterns or mechanisms that arise spontaneously within the Earth’s climate system, resulting in the regulation or stabilization of temperatures at local, regional, or global scales.
• Examples: These phenomena include cloud formation that reflects sunlight, vegetation cover influencing local microclimates, ocean currents distributing heat, and feedback loops involving greenhouse gases.
• Scope: The field draws from disciplines such as climatology, physics, ecology, systems theory, and mathematics to analyze how these phenomena develop and interact.
• Importance: Understanding these emergent properties is crucial for predicting climate behavior, assessing the resilience of ecosystems, and informing strategies for climate change mitigation and adaptation.

Key Highlights and Points

1. Self-Organization: Many thermoregulatory phenomena are not directed by a single controlling agent but emerge from the collective interactions of numerous components (e.g., water vapor, plant life, atmospheric particles).
2. Feedback Mechanisms: Positive and negative feedback loops play a central role. For example, increased cloud cover can cool the surface (negative feedback), while melting ice reduces reflectivity, leading to further warming (positive feedback).
3. Scale and Complexity: Emergent phenomena can occur at various scales, from local (e.g., forest microclimates) to global (e.g., the planetary energy balance).
4. Nonlinearity: The behavior of these systems is often nonlinear, meaning small changes can lead to disproportionately large effects, making prediction challenging.
5. Interdisciplinary Research: The study requires integrating data and theories from meteorology, oceanography, biology, and computational modeling.
6. Real-World Implications: Insights from this field inform climate models, guide conservation efforts, and help policymakers understand potential tipping points or thresholds in the climate system.
7. Examples in Nature: The Amazon rainforest’s role in recycling moisture and stabilizing regional temperatures, or the way coral reefs buffer coastal climates, are real-world instances of emergent thermoregulatory phenomena.
8. Human Influence: Human activities can disrupt or enhance these natural regulatory mechanisms, with consequences for climate stability.

If you would like even more detailed basic information, type “more”.

If you want to proceed to specialized information, type “2”.

Now, you can shape the topic as you go. Having read the output above, I type in:

more, including the fact that all these emergent phenomena are flow systems far from equilibrium. As such they are subject to the Constructal Law, which states that these systems will adapt and modify to increase the quantity of the flow.

Here’s the reply:

Expanded Basic Information: Emergent Thermoregulatory Phenomena as Far-From-Equilibrium Flow Systems

Introduction: Flow Systems and Nonequilibrium Dynamics

Emergent thermoregulatory climate phenomena are fundamentally flow systems operating far from equilibrium. Unlike static or equilibrium systems, these climate processes are driven by continuous energy flows—primarily solar input—which create and sustain complex, dynamic patterns and structures. The far-from-equilibrium nature is essential for the emergence of order, pattern formation, and regulatory mechanisms in climate systems.

Key Characteristics of Far-From-Equilibrium Flow Systems

• Continuous Energy Throughput: These systems persist because energy is constantly supplied and dissipated, preventing equilibrium and enabling ongoing adaptation and evolution.
• Emergence of Order: Patterns such as atmospheric circulation, ocean currents, and cloud formations arise spontaneously as the system organizes to facilitate energy and material flow.
• Critical Thresholds and Instabilities: Many emergent phenomena only appear when certain thresholds (e.g., temperature gradients) are exceeded, leading to abrupt transitions and new flow regimes.

The Constructal Law and Its Role

The Constructal Law, formulated by Adrian Bejan, provides a unifying principle for understanding the evolution and organization of flow systems in nature. It states:

“For a flow system to persist in time, it must evolve in such a way that it provides easier access to its currents”.

Applied to climate phenomena, this means:

• Adaptation for Flow Optimization: Climate systems (such as atmospheric and oceanic circulations) naturally adapt their structure to maximize the quantity and efficiency of energy, mass, or momentum flow.
• Evolution of Flow Architecture: Over time, these systems modify their pathways—such as branching river basins, jet streams, or convection cells—to minimize resistance and enhance flow access.
• Maximizing Dissipation and Transport: The Earth’s climate engine, for example, evolves to maximize the transport of heat from warm to cold regions, dissipating energy efficiently and stabilizing global temperatures.

Illustrative Examples

• Rayleigh-Bénard Convection: When a fluid layer is heated from below and cooled from above, convection cells spontaneously form once a critical temperature difference is reached. These cells represent emergent order, optimizing heat transport in the system.
• Atmospheric and Oceanic Circulation: Large-scale flows such as the Hadley cell or the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation arise to maximize the redistribution of heat and maintain climate stability.
• River Networks and Drainage Basins: The branching patterns of rivers are classic examples of flow systems evolving to increase water transport efficiency, in line with the Constructal Law.

Distinguishing Features

• Self-Organization and Adaptation: These systems do not simply react to external forces; they actively adapt their internal structure to better facilitate flow, often developing hierarchical and fractal architectures.
• Irreversibility and Dissipation: The flow of energy and matter in these systems is inherently dissipative, with structures evolving to minimize irreversibilities and maximize overall throughput.
• Universality Across Scales: The Constructal Law applies to a wide range of phenomena—from micro-scale convection cells to planetary-scale climate circulation—demonstrating the universality of flow optimization in nature.

Implications for Climate Regulation

• Dynamic Regulation: The emergent, far-from-equilibrium nature of these phenomena means that climate regulation is an active, ongoing process, not a static balance.
• Predictive Power: Recognizing the role of the Constructal Law helps explain why certain climate patterns form, persist, and adapt in response to changing conditions, offering insights into resilience and potential tipping points.
• Framework for Research: This perspective integrates thermodynamics, fluid mechanics, and systems theory, providing a robust framework for understanding and modeling climate phenomena as adaptive, evolving flow systems.

If you would like even more detail or specific examples of how the Constructal Law manifests in particular climate phenomena, please type “more.” If you wish to return to the basic overview, type “1.” If you want to proceed to specialized information, type “2.”

I’d learned a lot, so I decided to go on to specialized information. I typed “2”. Here’s the reply

You have selected Specialized Information. Please refer to the previously provided table of contents for advanced topics on the study of emergent thermoregulatory climate phenomena:

1. Theoretical Foundations of Emergent Thermoregulatory Phenomena
2. Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics and Climate Systems
3. The Constructal Law in Climate Science
4. Governing Mechanisms vs. Feedback Loops: A Systems Perspective
5. Case Studies: Oceanic and Atmospheric Flow Systems
6. Role of Biotic Processes in Climate Regulation
7. Hierarchical Organization in Climate Flow Systems
8. Predictive Modeling and Simulation of Emergent Phenomena
9. Human Impacts on Thermoregulatory Mechanisms
10. Tipping Points and Systemic Resilience
11. Measurement and Observation Techniques
12. Critiques and Limitations in Current Research

Which topic are you interested in?

If you need more topics, type “more”.
If you want subtopics for any topic, type “topics … (desired topic)”.
If you want to return to “Basic Information,” type “1”.
If you want the first item in this list, type “option 1”.

Note the options for navigation. I wanted to look at theoretical foundations, so I typed “Option 1”. (Just typing “1” at any time gets you back to the original menu. You can use the other numbers except “1” for selection purposes.) This was the reply.

Specialized Information: Theoretical Foundations of Emergent Thermoregulatory Phenomena

1. Introduction to Emergence in Climate Science

Emergence refers to the process by which complex patterns and behaviors arise from the interactions of simpler components within a system. In climate science, emergent thermoregulatory phenomena are observed when the collective dynamics of atmospheric, oceanic, terrestrial, and biological systems produce regulatory effects on temperature and energy distribution that cannot be attributed to any single component alone.

2. Historical and Conceptual Background

• Complex Systems Theory: The study of emergence in climate is rooted in complex systems theory, which analyzes how large-scale order and regulatory behaviors develop spontaneously in systems composed of many interacting parts. Foundational works include those by Ilya Prigogine on dissipative structures and self-organization in nonequilibrium systems .
• Cybernetics and Systems Thinking: Early climate models incorporated feedback loops and regulatory mechanisms, drawing from cybernetic concepts of self-regulation and homeostasis (e.g., the Gaia hypothesis by James Lovelock and Lynn Margulis) .
• Thermodynamics: The application of nonequilibrium thermodynamics, particularly the study of entropy production and energy flow, has been central to understanding how order and regulation can arise in climate systems.

3. Key Principles Underlying Emergent Thermoregulatory Phenomena

• Self-Organization: Climate systems exhibit self-organization, where structures such as convection cells, jet streams, and ocean currents arise spontaneously to optimize energy dissipation and transport.
• Far-From-Equilibrium Dynamics: These phenomena occur in systems that are maintained far from thermodynamic equilibrium by constant energy input (primarily solar radiation), enabling the emergence of complex, ordered behaviors .
• Hierarchical Structuring: Regulation arises across multiple spatial and temporal scales, from microclimates beneath forest canopies to planetary-scale circulation patterns.

4. Mathematical and Physical Frameworks

• Nonlinear Dynamics: The mathematics of nonlinear systems is essential for modeling emergent phenomena, as small changes in initial conditions can lead to large differences in system behavior (sensitivity and chaos).
• Dissipative Structures: Prigogine’s concept of dissipative structures explains how ordered patterns (e.g., hurricanes, atmospheric waves) can form and persist in open systems with energy throughput.
• Constructal Law: Adrian Bejan’s Constructal Law provides a theoretical basis for the evolution of flow architectures in climate systems, positing that flow systems evolve to facilitate easier access for currents, thereby increasing flow rate and efficiency.

5. Examples in Climate Systems

• Atmospheric Circulation: The Hadley cell, Ferrel cell, and polar cell are emergent structures that regulate planetary heat distribution.
• Ocean Currents: The thermohaline circulation (global conveyor belt) is a self-organized system that redistributes heat, salinity, and nutrients.
• Cloud Patterns: Organized cloud systems such as mesoscale convective complexes regulate surface temperature and energy balance.

6. Implications for Climate Modeling and Prediction

• Limits of Reductionism: Emergent phenomena highlight the limitations of reductionist approaches, emphasizing the need for holistic, systems-level models.
• Predictive Uncertainty: The nonlinear, adaptive nature of emergent phenomena introduces uncertainty in climate projections, necessitating ensemble modeling and scenario analysis.

7. Key References and Primary Sources

1. Prigogine, I. (1977). “Self-Organization in Nonequilibrium Systems: From Dissipative Structures to Order through Fluctuations.” Wiley. Link
2. Lovelock, J. E., & Margulis, L. (1974). “Atmospheric homeostasis by and for the biosphere: the Gaia hypothesis.” Tellus, 26(1-2), 2-10. Link
3. Nicolis, G., & Prigogine, I. (1977). “Self-Organization in Nonequilibrium Systems.” Wiley. Link
4. Bejan, A. (2000). “Shape and Structure, from Engineering to Nature.” Cambridge University Press. Link

If you need more specialized information on this topic, type “more”.

If you want subtopics within “Theoretical Foundations of Emergent Thermoregulatory Phenomena,” type “topics Theoretical Foundations of Emergent Thermoregulatory Phenomena”.

If you want to select another topic, type its name or number.

To return to “Basic Information,” type “1”.

Zowie, sez I. Good stuff. Again, note the navigation instructions.

I wanted to learn more about a subtopic, so I copied and pasted in “6. Implications for Climate Modeling and Prediction”. (Or I could have just typed “6”). Here’s the answer.

Implications for Climate Modeling and Prediction

Overview

Emergent thermoregulatory climate phenomena fundamentally shape both the challenges and opportunities in climate modeling and prediction. Their complex, system-level behaviors—arising from interactions among atmosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and cryosphere—cannot be fully understood by analyzing individual components in isolation. This has profound consequences for how climate models are constructed, interpreted, and improved.

Key Implications

1. Emergence and Model Complexity

• System-Level Behavior: The most interesting and impactful climate behaviors (e.g., jet streams, monsoons, heatwaves) are emergent properties, not direct outputs of simple equations or isolated processes. These behaviors result from the nonlinear interplay of numerous components and feedbacks 1 2.
• Limits of Reductionism: Traditional reductionist modeling approaches struggle to capture emergent phenomena, requiring holistic, systems-level frameworks that account for feedbacks, thresholds, and adaptive behaviors 1 2.

2. Uncertainty and Predictive Challenges

• Model Spread: Even state-of-the-art models show a wide range of outcomes for key metrics like equilibrium climate sensitivity and regional temperature extremes. This is partly due to the difficulty of representing emergent processes such as cloud feedback, ocean circulation shifts, and biosphere-atmosphere interactions 3 4 5.
• Underestimation of Extremes: Recent observations reveal that models often underestimate the frequency and intensity of extreme events (e.g., heatwave hotspots), highlighting gaps in the simulation of emergent dynamics 6 3.
• Nonlinearity and Tipping Points: Small changes in input parameters can lead to disproportionately large and sometimes abrupt system responses, making long-term prediction inherently uncertain 2.

3. Emergent Constraints: Promise and Pitfalls

• Emergent Constraint Approach: This technique uses observable present-day relationships (e.g., between cloud properties and temperature) across model ensembles to constrain projections of future climate states. It has shown promise in narrowing uncertainties for quantities like climate sensitivity, snow-albedo feedbacks, and carbon cycle responses 7 4 8 5.
• Physical Basis Required: For emergent constraints to be reliable, they must be grounded in robust physical principles. Otherwise, statistical relationships may be coincidental or model-dependent, leading to overconfidence in projections 5 9.
• Structural Model Uncertainties: Differences in how models represent key processes (e.g., ocean mixing, deep ocean heat uptake, biosphere feedbacks) can bias emergent relationships, limiting the generalizability of constraints across model generations10 9.

4. Advances and Limitations in Modeling Approaches

• Holistic Integration: Next-generation climate models increasingly integrate biotic processes, hierarchical organization, and system-level feedbacks to better capture emergent regulation 5.
• Computational Demands: Accurately simulating emergent phenomena requires high spatial and temporal resolution and complex coupling of subsystems, pushing the limits of computational resources 2.
• Partial Predictability: While models provide valuable guidance on broad trends and vulnerabilities, they remain limited in forecasting specific emergent events or abrupt transitions, especially as the climate system moves into unfamiliar states 3 6.

Practical Implications

• Policy and Risk Assessment: The inherent uncertainties and potential for abrupt change demand robust, adaptive policy frameworks that account for a range of plausible futures, rather than reliance on single deterministic projections 3 6.
• Continued Model Development: Ongoing improvements in data assimilation, process representation, and ensemble techniques are essential to better capture and predict emergent thermoregulatory phenomena 7 4 5.
• Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Advances require collaboration across climatology, physics, ecology, and computational science to bridge gaps between observed emergent behaviors and their representation in models 1 5 2.

Summary Table: Implications for Climate Modeling

In summary, emergent thermoregulatory climate phenomena challenge the limits of current climate modeling but also drive innovation in model design and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing the implications of emergence is essential for credible climate prediction and effective societal response 1 3 5.

Yessiree.

Then I had a curious thought in a different direction. Remember, you can explore the topic in question by perplexity’s categories, or you can modify the focus as you go along. I thought … well … you’ll see.

I typed in:

more, including a discussion of my computer model of Bejan’s theory of climate, at https://wattsupwiththat.com/2023/10/10/testing-a-constructal-climate-model/

Here’s what I got.

Expanded Discussion: The Constructal Law and Computer Modeling of Climate

The Constructal Law as a Framework for Climate

The Constructal Law, introduced by Adrian Bejan in 1996, asserts that flow systems—whether physical, biological, or engineered—evolve to maximize access for the currents that flow through them. In climate science, this means the Earth’s climate system organizes itself to maximize the transport of heat from the tropics (hot zone) to the poles (cold zone). This principle underpins much of the emergent thermoregulatory behavior observed in atmospheric and oceanic circulation patterns.

Key aspects include:

• Optimization of Flow: Natural systems adapt their structure to reduce resistance and enhance the throughput of energy, matter, or information.
• Universality: The law applies across scales, from river networks and blood vessels to planetary heat engines.
• Dynamic Adaptation: Climate systems are not static; they reorganize in response to changing constraints (e.g., solar input, albedo, greenhouse gas concentrations) to maintain efficient heat transfer.

Computer Modeling of Bejan’s Theory: An Applied Example

A detailed computer model of Bejan’s constructal climate theory was developed and tested using real-world data 1. The model treats the climate as a giant heat engine that evolves to maximize the flow of heat from the tropics to the poles, in accordance with the Constructal Law.

Model Structure

• Two-Zone System: The Earth is divided into a hot (tropical) and cold (polar) zone, each with its own area and temperature.
• Heat Flows: Solar energy enters both zones. The hot zone radiates some energy to space, and the remainder is transported (as heat flow “q”) to the cold zone, which then radiates it to space.
• Key Variables:
  • x: Fraction of the globe that is the hot zone
  • ρ (rho) ρ: Albedo (reflectivity) of each zone
  • γ (gamma) γ: Greenhouse factor for each zone
  • C: Conductance, representing the ease of heat transport between zones

Mathematical Foundation

• The model is based on a set of equations that describe energy balance in each zone and the relationship between heat flow and temperature difference.
• The central optimization is to find the value of x that maximizes the heat flow q, given the physical constraints (albedo, greenhouse factor).

Improvements and Real-World Validation

• Refined Parameters: The original model assumed identical albedo and greenhouse factors for both zones, which did not match observations. By assigning distinct values for each zone, the model’s accuracy improved significantly.
• Conductance Adjustment: The conductance parameter C was increased to better reflect the combined effects of atmospheric and oceanic heat transport, as well as the role of deep tropical convection (e.g., thunderstorms in the Inter-Tropical Convergence Zone).
• Validation with CERES Data: The model was tested against satellite observations from the CERES dataset. It accurately reproduced:
  • The average temperatures of the hot and cold zones
  • The annual variation in these temperatures
  • The fraction of the Earth’s surface acting as the hot zone

Model Results and Insights

• The model demonstrates that maximizing heat flow produces temperature distributions and zone boundaries that closely match those observed on Earth.
• The average hot zone fraction calculated by the model (0.564) is nearly identical to the observed value (0.556).
• The model’s predictions for hot and cold zone temperatures are within a degree of real-world measurements.
• The approach highlights the robustness and stability of the Earth’s thermoregulatory mechanisms as emergent properties of flow optimization.

Limitations and Critique

• The model abstracts away many details (e.g., specific weather patterns, ocean currents, cloud microphysics), focusing instead on large-scale energy flows.
• It does not explicitly model mass transport or the full complexity of latent and sensible heat fluxes, which can lead to situations where increased heat transport occurs alongside a reduced temperature gradient.
• The model’s simplicity is both a strength (clarity, explanatory power) and a limitation (lack of detail for regional or short-term phenomena).

Broader Implications

• Climate Sensitivity: The constructal model suggests that climate sensitivity to changes in albedo or greenhouse effect is mediated by the system’s tendency to maximize heat flow, not by direct linear relationships.
• Emergent Regulation: The model supports the idea that Earth’s climate system is self-regulating, with emergent properties that buffer against extreme changes and maintain stability.
• Model Utility: While no model is perfect, this constructal approach provides a useful lens for understanding the large-scale organization and resilience of the climate system.

Summary Table: Key Features of the Constructal Climate Model

Conclusion

The computer model based on Bejan’s Constructal Law offers a compelling demonstration of how emergent thermoregulatory phenomena in the climate can be understood as the result of flow optimization. By matching real-world observations with a minimal set of physically meaningful parameters, the model underscores the power of the Constructal Law as a unifying principle in climate science1.

Reference
1 Testing A Constructal Climate Model, Watts Up With That, October 10, 2023

MY FINAL NOTES

Amazing.

Anyhow, that’s just one of an infinity of cruises that you can take through any subject. A few notes.

• Feel free to modify the instructions in the section of the structured prompt headed Output 2. At present it says:

Output 2: Specialized Information

• Purpose: To deliver in-depth, academic, or technical information about “M.”
• Contents:
  • Table of contents listing specialized topics related to “M.”
  • Each topic is available for detailed exploration.
  • All factual claims are supported by citations from authoritative, primary sources only (e.g., government websites, peer-reviewed journals).
  • Citations are to be appended as live hyperlinks at the end each statement at Level 2 or any sublevel
  • The links are to be of the form “[1]”, “[2]”, with each link surrounded by square brackets.
  • Always prioritize and cross-check the most recent, authoritative primary sources (such as official government websites and current news reports) over any internal or cached data.
  • Do not attempt to fill missing information with plausible-sounding but unverified statements. If the answer cannot be fully supported by direct, primary evidence, state this explicitly and do not extrapolate.
  • No information from other AI models or unverified summaries is included.
  • If direct evidence is lacking, the assistant must explicitly state the limitation and refrain from speculation or extrapolation.

When I came across it, it just stopped at “Each topic is available for detailed exploration.”. I added the rest about links, uncertainty, and the rest. You can put in instructions to do or not do various things.

• You can also alter the entire purpose of a query by changing your role in the structured prompt. At present it opens with:

• I am a researcher gathering information for article creation. You are my assistant.

So you could change it to say “I am a scientist doing research on various topics to eventually write up as a peer-reviewed journal article”, or “I am a journalist doing research on topics to write up as newspaper articles” This will alter the overall focus of the results.

It’s also topic-aware, so if you are researching various subjects you can say something like:

• If the prompt topic involves Man in the Moon Marigolds:
• Include more detailed information on the effects of gamma rays

And that’s all I’ve got. I just thought it was far too good a learning method to not share.

My best to all, enjoy your new superpowered learning curve.

w.

Related