Below is a new, five-step climate change strategic plan that is radically different from past failed plans. It was created by Job One for Humanity, the Universe Institute think tanks, and other climate researchers and analysts who are unafraid to speak the uncensored facts and dangers of climate change.
This evaluation of past failed climate change strategies and recommendations for a more successful future climate change strategy was designed for an upcoming global climate strategy conference, which will be attended by numerous global climate change and environmental groups whose representives we assume to be highly educated in climate science, advanced data analysis, systems theory, and hopefully the new DMAP (dialectical metasystemic analysis and proiblem-solving) methodoligies.
This new climate change remedial strategy is designed to be freely distributed by climate change and environmental activists, individuals, and organizations, so that it reaches not only the larger climate change and environmental organizations, but also smaller climate and environmental groups worldwide. Please help distribute this challenging new climate change strategy to every climate change and environmental group in your network.
Despite what you hear in the media or from your government, climate change is actually worsening at a greatly accelerating pace. Comprehensive and dispassionate climate change science and mathematics predict massive starvation and a massive die off, not at 2100 or 2070, but long before that, beginning around 2035 to 2040.
There are two very powerful videos at the end of this article’s documentation. The first one is a passionate summary of this new climate change strategy.
Towards A More Successful Global Future Climate Change Strategy that has a Realistic Hope of Saving Humanity
What has been happening over the last 60 years through the various forces of the climate change educational movement is what we can call Plan A. Plan A, which has mainly consisted of trying to reduce global fossil fuel use to manage climate change, has been a total failure over the last 60 years. Global fossil fuel use and atmospheric greenhouse gases are rising faster than ever at a near-exponential rate.
When we say past PLAN A strategies have been a total failure, we mean that nothing has worked to lower or slow the rise in global fossil fuel use and greenhouse gas emissions. This is despite the numerous climate change mass protests, news articles, and climate leaders (such as James Hansen, Al Gore, Bill McKibben, Greta Thunberg, and Roger Hallam), as well as approximately 30 international climate conferences, and thousands of climate change podcasts, TikToks, Instagram posts, movies, and documentaries.
Anyone who can’t admit that Plan A is a total failure does not know how to read the graph below, or is in some form of denial, and shouldn’t be involved in future climate change strategy planning because they are not dealing with the 60-year reality of failed global warming and fossil fuel reduction.
If you can’t admit the reality you are currently facing, it is highly unlikely you will be able to devise a plan to manage it. It is time for the climate change movement to discuss a new and adaptive Plan B strategy for achieving future success in climate change reduction.
Plan B below is about adapting to the reality of 60 years of climate change reduction failure.
Here are the five main action steps of the new Plan B for a more successful future climate change strategy:
Step 1. Because governments will likely not act in time to reduce global fossil fuel use to the required amounts to prevent mass human extinction of up to 50% of the population, it is critical for ALL climate change and environmental organizations to urgently begin telling their members to begin emergency preparation, adaptation, and resilience building to survive the severe and soon arriving climate change consequences we can no longer avoid.
Any future climate change remedial strategy that does not include the intense, continual encouragement of individuals to immediately begin creating emergency preparations, adaptation, and resilience-building in their homes, businesses, and communities to prepare for and cope with the escalating climate change emergency would be immoral and irresponsible. In some cases, those in high-risk areas affected by climate change should also consider relocation, also known as migration or, in sanitized government language that denies or hides the dangers of climate change, “managed retreat.”
Sixty years of government failures in reducing fossil fuel use have repeatedly shown that our government’s future success probability in reducing climate change is highly improbable. Due to this highly probable ongoing government failure, not having an emergency backup plan in case things continue to go wrong, which accounts for this ongoing government failure, is strategically beyond foolish. It would also demonstrate a dangerous ignorance of the Precautionary Principle (especially given the preponderance of valid climate change information) and the fundamentals of strategic planning, which involve working for the best while simultaneously preparing for the worst. It would also betray the reality that these organizations did not understand:
1. The current physics and mathematics of accelerating climate change consequences and timetables, particularly the Climageddon Feedback Loop.
2. Our current acceleration through the four extinction-forwarding climate change tipping points.
Documentation and details that support the validity of Step One are found at the bottom of this document.
Step 2. Despite the climate movement’s 60 years of failure to influence governments to reduce global fossil fuel use to the required levels, it should continue experimenting with these influence actions.
However, it should also recognize that it is highly unlikely for the world’s governments and politicians to act effectively until the level of undeniable chaos, havoc, and loss of assets and lives reaches a point where politicians fear their citizens will remove them from office if they do not act immediately. Politicians will only reduce global fossil fuel use towards the real and required levels when that level of chaos is reached, and they fear for their jobs and incomes.
Realistically, effective government-driven reductions in fossil fuel use will likely not occur for another 10 to 20 years, probably closer to 20 years. Any strategy to influence our bought-off, hard-nosed politicians before massive climate change-caused chaos and unconscionable suffering is global, and the public screaming for their heads should be viewed as having a very slow and low success rate, yet it still should be done otherwise it may take much longer than 10 to 20 years for government to act effectively.
The urgency behind continuing these mostly unsuccessful government actions is that, at some point, they can hopefully reach a threshold level where they will save as many people as possible after 2050. It is currently too late to save approximately half of humanity before 2050 due to the massive accumulation of greenhouse gases already in the atmosphere, which cannot be removed in time. However, if we do not maintain pressure on the governments, we will not meet that essential global fossil fuel reduction threshold, and his view is that 5 to 15% of humanity will survive after 2070.
Documentation and details that support the validity of Step Two are found at the bottom of this document.
Step 3. We must aggressively inform the world that accelerating climate change will not destroy all of humanity, only about half of humanity, but that 50% is only if our governments act soon.
There is a paradoxical relationship between what Mother Nature will do and what our governments will eventually do to save us. Here is that Paradox. Our governments have failed their trust in responsibility to fix accelerating climate change in global warming. Mother Nature is going to step in and bypass the irresponsible action of our governments and fix the climate change problem for us. Still, it will be in the most painful and undesirable way you could imagine.
Saving about half of humanity post-2050 will be primarily due to the actions of Mother Nature. She will rescue humanity through the massive accelerating consequences of climate change (not geoengineering).
Mother Nature will herself radically reduce the human population by about 50%. This 50% reduction of the human population will also result in about a 50% reduction in global fossil fuel use. This radical and inevitable drop in global fossil fuel use, powered by Mother Nature’s enforcement of climate consequences, should be just enough to save much of the rest of humanity, hopefully as much as 50%.
Telling the world half of humanity is going to die because of the 60 years, our governments have failed to fix climate change when they remedy could’ve been gradual and doable and that there’s nothing we can do to save half of humanity right now (because of Garrett’s climate change paradox and other climate consequences described in the documentation) is the honest and needed “shock and awe” climate change emergency education. This level of “shock and awe” is needed because nothing else has worked.
This truthful statement of humanity’s climate change future will likely spark controversy and counterattacks in both media and non-media reactions. Both the controversy and the counterattack will then serve as a powerful new carrier wave to wake the world to the accelerating crisis and the emergency preparations and adaptations it needs.
Climate and environmental organizations should immediately begin discussing how Mother Nature’s growing “kill the virus” reaction to the global warming “fever” humanity has inflicted upon her is our most likely, last, and most realistic hope of saving a large portion of humanity.
Here is where the rest of the paradox comes in. Suppose our governments continue for more than 20 years without making major global fossil fuel reductions. In that case, accelerating climate change consequences, combined with the consequences of Mother Nature’s cause-and-effect enforcement power, could reduce the human population to 5% to 15% of its current size.
However, the 15% to 5% human reduction outcome is highly improbable because, at some point (10 to 20 years from now), our governments and politicians will act to preserve themselves and their privileges and protect themselves from the angry public.
Here’s more about why telling the truth, “shock and awe” fear-awakening strategy, is more effective for future climate change education and action. It is based on climate change and environmental movements, explaining our unavoidable mass extinction and Mother Nature’s fail-safe climate change solution.
1. Telling mature adults about a real problem and emergency is not spreading fear; it’s a necessary precaution. Fear is a powerful evolutionary motivator, but only in mature adults (about 30% or less in the population).
Fear is not successful in 50% of the human population with an average IQ of 100. Fear confuses them and disperses their effort. Unfortunately, we can do nothing about those individuals who cannot understand the complexities of the climate change emergency until it is too late.
2. Fear also does not motivate 20% of the population, who are so distracted by their current financial and personal problems and designed media distractions that they can’t hold a thought, a behavior, or an action long enough to do anything meaningful about climate change anyway.
3. This shock-and-awe strategy will generate immediate attention, controversy, and counterattacks. The controversy and counterattacks will carry our “Climate Change Emergency Act Now” message across global media, which we could never reach because of nonprofit finances or media gatekeepers.
Look at how Trump generates continuous shocking controversy after controversy to consistently dominate global media coverage. Sadly, shocking controversy in today’s media environment is the single most successful carrier wave of messages, both pro and con. This is the reality of the world we live in, and we must use it for the worthy purpose of saving as much of humanity as still is possible.
4. We strongly suspect that the global fossil fuel cartel has also been secretly funding bogus research studies with some cash-strapped climate researchers or general academics to produce studies that suggest or “prove” that speaking fearfully about climate change is ineffective. If the researcher’s study cherry-picks its criteria and delivers those results, the cash-hungry researcher knows they will have more funding in the future.
The new “Don’t talk climate change fear” studies that have been appearing recently conclude that “fear does not work when discussing climate change.”
This is not true in evolution or for 30% of mature adults. Over millions of years, evolution has repeatedly and conclusively proven how fear can successfully motivate action and that action often saves the individual from extinction or harm. 30% of mature adults will act in some way based on accurate climate information.
5. The climate education movement needs to stop worrying about or catering their messages to the other 70% of the population who are too immature, so distracted, or lack adequate intellectual capacity to understand the complexity of the accelerating climate change emergency. The majority of this 70% will never do anything to help manage the climate change emergency. In most cases, if they ever act, they will not act until it’s far too late, and maybe not even after being driven out of their homes or businesses after their third or fourth climate change catastrophe.
Documentation and details that support the validity of Step Three are found at the bottom of this document.
Step 4. Environmental and climate organizations should also advocate for the establishment of a new and effective global governance entity to stop and reverse the impact of climate change on humanity.
Our governments and the UN’s IPCC have all totally failed to manage climate change over the last 60 years. Climate change is now worsening faster than ever.
Doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result is the definition of insanity.
Without a new global entity emerging with the power to make and enforce laws transnationally, the accelerating global warming emergency and the global reduction of fossil fuel use are far beyond the ability of any individual nation or international collective to negotiate or resolve.
About thirty International climate conferences have taught us that lesson! Individual nations will continue to do precisely what they have done for decades: lie, cheat, and delay making the required fossil fuel reductions. They will do everything they can to preserve their national competitive advantage.
Only the evolution of a new global governance entity will ultimately solve the transnational climate change emergency. If environmental and climate groups actively begin pushing this, it will accelerate the necessary and challenging process of this inevitable evolutionary transition. It will also draw more individuals sympathetic to global governance into the environmental and climate change educational movement.
We recognize that this final strategic action is the most challenging and least likely to occur soon; yet, this healing seed must be planted, for otherwise, climate change will never have a permanent resolution.
Documentation and details that support the validity of Step Four are found at the bottom of this document.
Our Bonus Step Five is to keep bringing even more lawsuits against the global fossil fuel cartel to make them pay for all the climate change damages caused by their toxic and polluting products.
This is already underway worldwide, with thousands of lawsuits being filed independently by individuals and businesses, as well as states and nations, which are becoming increasingly aware that there is someone directly responsible for their climate change-related damages. On this page and the pages linked from it, we explain in detail why the global fossil fuel cartel is legally and financially responsible for all climate change consequences. From the links on this page, we also provide access to law firms suing the global fossil fuel cartel, as well as ongoing and completed individual, business, and state court cases worldwide.
These thousands of lawsuits are holding the global fossil fuel cartel accountable for its disinformation campaign, dirty tricks, and the damages caused by its polluting and toxic products. It is now time for climate change and environmental nonprofit organizations to vigorously educate about the importance of holding the global fossil fuel cartel legally and financially responsible for the climate change consequences, and how to get started with these lawsuits.
In Summary
1. It would be unethical, immoral, and even bordering on criminal not to reach out to the 30% of the mature adult population who will respond positively to accurate but fear-inducing climate change forecasts and begin to take the necessary actions to protect themselves.
2. There is also a high probability that by 2031-40, when the consequences of climate change have continued to rise exponentially and are causing unconscionable global chaos, havoc, and loss, our governments and politicians will finally act to implement the then-required radical global cuts in fossil fuel emissions. While it will still be far too late to save about half of humanity (because of, in part, Garrett’s climate change paradox), it should contribute just enough to the total global reduction of fossil fuel use needed to help save as much of the remaining post-2050 surviving human population as possible.
However, this extra push for fossil fuel reduction beyond the Mother Nature-driven mass die-off will only be effective if we can get our governments to make major reductions in fossil fuel use within the next 6 years.
3. Successfully preparing the population for the future of climate change through emergency preparation, adaptation, and resilience-building is far better than continuing to do only what the climate movement has been doing for the last 60 years and expecting a different result.
Additional Strategy-Relevant Climate Change Information and Links
Step One and Step Three Documentation
What to do About this Climate Change Nightmare:
Click here for what we must do to save ourselves, our families, businesses, nations, and as much of humanity as possible.
Click here for what our governments must do.
The following documentation also applies to both Step One and Step Three strategies. This explains in excruciating detail why Half of humanity has already been condemned to death by our governments 60 years of inaction, and we must begin preparing, adapting, and building resilience for the coming climate catastrophe:
Here is a link to Garrett’s climate change paradox. It will help explain why 50% of the human population will not survive, no matter what we do, at this point because our governments and politicians have failed to act over the last 60 years when these consequences could have been avoided.
Here is the link that will explain runaway global warming, what near-total extinction vs. total extinction means, and why we face only near-total extinction, not total extinction. Finally, it will explain humanity’s tiny yet real hope for a livable future if our governments act in concert with many of the world’s citizens.
Click here for the four extinction-driving climate tipping points. The first has already been crossed, and the second runaway global warming tipping point will be crossed in the next 3-6 years. This page will explain precisely why, if we are lucky, we have only 3-6 years left to maintain some level of effective control over our climate change future before the immutable laws of climate and atmospheric greenhouse gas physics take over.
Click here for the detailed climate-driven processes of global collapse and mass to near-total extinction. Here you will see the cascade of almost 80 primary and secondary climate change consequences unfolding and interacting with humanity’s 11 other major global crises. After reading this page, you will understand why the extinction of half of humanity by 2050 is already an unavoidable reality. All that remains now is to fight to save the other 50% of humanity and prevent our near-total extinction.
Click here for the link to the Climageddon Feedback Scenario, which explains how all of the climate change systems and subsystems interact with each other. If you do not understand, the Climageddon Feedback Scenario,, you will not understand how interacting and interdependent climate systems and subsystems are creating humanities’s greatest nightmare.
Click here to read about why a climate change-driven total human extinction is extremely improbable and more about the details in how Mother Nature will save as much of humanity as possible.
Click here to understand why the very painful 2025 global fossil fuel reduction targets are humanity’s honest, last-chance fossil fuel reduction targets needed to prevent near-total extinction. Additionally, it provides detailed technical notes on the various factors that contribute to the correctly adjusted 2025 global fossil fuel reduction target calculations.
Click here to learn about the 11 major tipping points in climate change and how they will affect your future. The article details each tipping point, how it works, and its major dangers.
Click here for a list of the 30+ challenges humanity must overcome to end the climate change emergency and survive accelerating global warming.
Click here to read the ten most dangerous things almost everyone does not understand about our current runaway global heating emergency. This will also provide additional critical climate momentum and inertia factors, as well as other climate insights, partly explaining why we have only about 3-6 years left to maintain some level of effective control over our climate future.
Click here to learn about the many immoral tactics that the global fossil fuel cartel has used to prevent our government’s politicians and nonprofit organizations for 60 years from solving the climate change emergency because it would cut into their fossil fuel profits.
Click here and scroll down about a third of a page. You will see four illustrations that illustrate the undeniable failure of all previous international climate change treaties and conferences to halt the increasing rise in the amount of toxic and polluting carbon and methane in our atmosphere.
The Food Production Emergency Documentation for Step Three.
The following two illustrations show how climate change consequences will negatively impact food production. The first illustration is based on information from Stanford University. It looks back at crop yields from 2015 to 2023.
It examines the past, when the average global temperature increase was only 1.23°C. However, by 2025, we will have already surpassed the 1.5°C mark and are likely to reach 2°C by approximately 2031-2040.
Job One estimates that at a 2°C global heating increase, crop failure and lower crop yields due to increased heat, rain bombs, drought, sudden cold spells, derechos (wind storms), and the other climate consequences that will create highly unstable growing seasons that crops depend upon, will cause crop yields to soon drop on average 15 percent to as much as 30- 40+ percent.
This will cause mass starvation and mass migration at levels never seen before in human history. Mass migration at these levels will create many new conflict zones and push fearful nations dealing with this mass migration towards authoritarian rulers and emergency measures, where human rights will be significantly diminished.
The next food production illustration forecasts food production losses when the world hits an average global temperature increase of 2°C. Unlike Job One (we predict 2 degrees Celsius sometime between 2031 and 2040), the study below predicts 2°C by 2050, (not 2100, as the UN’s IPCC does.) We do not believe this research ives adequate weight to additional crossed tipping points and the climate sensitivity error issue (discussed in the IPCC errors documentation section further below). However, this new study provides valuable insights into the potential consequences of climate change, with a primary focus on the impact of increased pest damage on crop yields.
In the foor production and pest damage illustration below, if you also include climate change damage from heat, rain bombs, drought, sudden cold spells, derechos (wind storms), and all the other things that will create highly unstable growing seasons that crops depend upon, crop yields will drop much more than 30% by 2050, and there will be far more total crop failures. (Please note that pest which destroy crops are migrating to new zones because of global warming.)
Step Four documentation on why the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has failed us and why we need a new form of global governance to solve the climate change emergency and many other transnational crises.
Part 1: The errors and failures of the IPCC and our governments passing the grossly underestimated IPCC climate change data to us as fact
The following are the UN, IPCC Errors, Miscalculations, and other Related Factors Causing their Consequence, Severity, and Timetable Projections to continually be 30-60% underestimated:
Click here to understand the long-term history of the IPCC underestimating the consequences, timeframes, and the needed global fossil fuel reduction targets by as much as 30-60% or more. This page and its linked pages will help explain why the current 2025 global fossil fuel reductions are so severe, as they aim to compensate for the 60-plus years that society has delayed and failed to make the required gradual reductions in fossil fuel use. It is crucial to recognize the significant underestimation and other factors not fully accounted for in current climate risk assessments, as per the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) calculations and modeling.
Click here to see precisely how the IPCC “cooked the fossil fuel reduction calculations” and grossly skewed the current IPCC global fossil fuel reduction calculations by including unproven, non-existent, and unscalable “carbon-sucking unicorn” technology into their projections.
Click here to see the eleven major runaway global warming tipping points that have been all but excluded from the IPCC calculations on how much fossil fuel use humanity must reduce each year globally. The article also contains the tipping point theory and explains why crossing these climate tipping points is dangerous to all aspects of our globalized society.
Click here to see the four key reasons the IPCC’s 29 global climate change conferences have failed to produce results or legitimate global fossil fuel reduction targets.
Click here to see the IPCC’s huge atmospheric methane calculation problem.
Click here for the latest IPCC climate change summary report on the critical climate sensitivity error. Due to this ongoing climate sensitivity error, the IPCC’s latest climate consequence predictions, timeframes, and remedial action information may be underestimated by as much as 30% or more. (This 30% does not include the effect of the other IPCC errors described in the links just above.)
The decades of errors, “cooked” calculations, political, and other problems linked above mean that the IPCC is an unreliable partner for truthful and accurate climate change information. Their climate consequence predictions, timeframes, and remedial action information (global fossil fuel reduction targets) are compromised and grossly underestimated by 30 – 60 %+ and possibly more!
Part 2: Two Powerful videos on why a new form of global governance is needed to solve climate change:
Video 1: The Executive Director of Job One just completed video 1 after being asked by the Earth Constitution Institute to help explain to other climate change and environmental organizations why they should also be planting the seeds of effective global governance if they ever want to solve their many transnational issues like climate change pollution, species extinction, etc. It passionately discusses our government’s 60 years of climate change failure, the five-step new strategy for more successful climate change nd global warming reduction, and it explains why worldwide climate change and environmental groups must embrace creating some new form of effective global governance, or they will continue to win small meaningless battles and lose the war on the critical issues they are forwarding. This video was created with the intended audience of the senior executives at the world’s largest climate change and environmental organizations.
Click here for this important new video called Weather Sovereignty: Putting the World’s People in Charge of Climate Change.
Video 2: Below is a 16-minute brilliant video explaining the 70-year history of efforts to create effective global governance and why some form of global governance is indispensable for humanity to resolve the accelerating transnational climate change emergency and other international crises, such as pollution, war, and poverty.It also surprisingly explains why the world’s biggest and smallest well-intended nonprofit organizations may be winning many smaller environmental or social issue battles, but they are dreadfully losing the war for the future survival of the planet, particularly when it comes to climate change.
This short and riveting video, “The Forgotten History of the Idea of Global Democracy,” sheds light on why Job One for Humanity has been educating people about the indispensable need to evolve some form of global governance to effectively address climate change for decades. Once you have watched this compelling video, make up your mind if the video presenter has just convincingly explained what may be the world’s biggest unrecognized problem in solving the world’s other most dangerous problems. This video may be one of the best 16 minutes you’ll ever spend on the seemingly intractable problems of climate change and our other major world problems like war, poverty, pollution, etc.
Click here to view this well-reasoned 16-minute video.
To help do something about the climate change and global warming emergency, click here.
Sign up for our free Global Warming Blog by clicking here. (In your email, you will receive critical news, research, and the warning signs for the next global warming disaster.)
To share this blog post: Go to the Share button to the left below.